It turns out I trusted the LDIF I was given a little too much. An attribute was present that was not given a value. The value is not strictly required in the schema but is checked by acis to determine what fields may be returned in searches. With this field blank, the aci was not allowing the entry to show in searches at all. This is obviously an implementation issue on our end that needs to be fixed. My apologies for cluttering your mailboxes. Scott Scott Lacy wrote: > Hi All, > > I have an entry this morning that I have added via ldif. ldapmodify > gave no errors on the import, and the entry shows up in the backup > ldif I made of the database afterward. However, this user does not > show up in any searches. It is not an admin user, and is in the same > ou as the rest of the users. I did a larger ldif earlier this morning > of some additions and deletions, and they all seem to appear fine both > in the ldif and in searches. This is in 1.0.4. Any obvious things > that I'm missing or suggestions as to the problem? > > > Thanks, > > > Scott Lacy > Server Manager > Mercer University > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
