Great! Con you send me additional informations and possibly the code? It will be very helpful. Thanks. Dael Maselli. Gary Windham wrote: > On Jun 16, 2008, at 8:49 AM, Rich Megginson wrote: > >> Dael Maselli wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> is there any method to deny simple bind operation unless in a secure >>> channel (SSL or STARTTLS)? >> No. This relates to another requested feature, which is the ability >> to deny anonymous bind or other anonymous operations. I would like to >> get some requirements for such a feature. >> * allow simple bind/anonymous operations only over a secure channel? >> * allow simple bind/anonymous operations for certain hosts/ip addresses? >> * allow only certain anonymous operations, like startTLS and the >> password change extop? others? >> * other access control features related to the above? >>> Do I have to write a plug-in? Hints? >> Yes, at this point it would have to be a plug-in, most likely a bind >> pre-op plug-in. > > I have a bind pre-op plugin that meets the first two requirements; I > would be happy to share it with anyone interested. > > Thanks, > --Gary > > -- > Gary Windham > Senior Enterprise Systems Architect > The University of Arizona, UITS > +1 520 626 5981 > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users -- ___________________________________________________________________ Dael Maselli --- INFN-LNF Computing Service -- +39.06.9403.2214 ___________________________________________________________________ Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch ___________________________________________________________________ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 2944 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20080630/1f81a51e/attachment.bin