MMR issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Did you try the workaround in the bug report I sent to you on the
Redhat list?  What were your results?

For reference, that bug is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233642

Chris St. Pierre
Unix Systems Administrator
Nebraska Wesleyan University

On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, debu wrote:

>
> 
> Hi Guys,
> 
> I am stuck in a very crucial FDS server issue, it would be great if any one of you can help me somehow.
>
> We are upgrading from Fedora Directory Service from 1.0.4 to 1.1.0-3
>
> We have one existing Server with 1.0.4
>
> Now To one server we have initialized the data base and we were able to load the full DB. But, and when we start the replication we see the following error, and the incremental update is not happening.
>
> We are going for a multi master replication.
>
>
> Here is the error.
>
> On Supplier: (FDS Version 1.0.4) OS: Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES release 4 (Nahant)
>
>
> [17/Jun/2008:11:23:35 +051800] NSMMReplicationPlugin - agmt="cn=Replication_to_10.91.X.Y" (10:8888): Unable to acquire replica: Excessive clock skew between the supplier and the consumer. Replication is aborting.
>
> [17/Jun/2008:11:23:35 +051800] NSMMReplicationPlugin - agmt="cn=Replication_to_10.91.X.Y" (10:8888): Incremental update failed and requires administrator action
>
>
>
> On consumer: (FD version 1.1.0-3) OS: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.1 (Tikanga)
>
>
>
> [17/Jun/2008:11:12:59 +051800] NSMMReplicationPlugin - conn=46251 op=1975 replica="o=TejaUsers": Unable to acquire replica: error: excessive clock skew
>
> [17/Jun/2008:11:23:34 +051800] - csngen_adjust_time: adjustment limit exceeded; value - 86401, limit - 86400
>
> [17/Jun/2008:11:23:34 +051800] NSMMReplicationPlugin - conn=46461 op=792 replica="o=TejaUsers": Unable to acquire replica: error: excessive clock skew
>
>
> Now, My doubt is we succeded in a test environment with the same, with the only diference that we had the same OS in both the server, rest all same. Our servers are perfectly synced with NTP also.
>
> Please help in this scenario..
>
> Regards
> ~Debajit




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Apps]     [Maemo Users]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux