DANIEL CRISTIAN CRUZ wrote: > > Hi all, > > I asked a week ago about the missing packages. Why there is no package > there yet? > > I got a server dying at random, and said to my sponsors that a project > from Redhat would be stable and we could get updates when needed. If > there is no plan to build these packages, why there is no warning on > the first page? Using a package with a serious bug in which any search > could stop your server is insane. > > There is no maintainer for the repository? > Yes. The problem with FC6 RPMs is that they have to be manually built, signed, and distributed, since Koji/Bodhi do not support FC6. The Fedora guys had been doing me a favor and signing them with the Fedora GPG key, but they don't want to do this anymore, and I don't blame them. So I have signed these with my personal GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=rmeggins&op=index Type bits /keyID Date User ID pub 1024D/A7B02652 2008/07/01 Rich Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com> The RPMs are now available. You will have to import my GPG public key into your rpm key store in order to be able to use yum to install these new RPMs. > > Regards, > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *Daniel Cristian Cruz* > *Administrador de Banco de Dados > *Dire??o Regional - *N?cleo de Tecnologia da Informa??o > SENAI - SC > Telefone: 48-3239-1422 (ramal 1422)* > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3258 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20080701/781e6a78/attachment.bin
