Also, keep in mind that the?hugest directories...are often small in disk space and easy to do 100% caching in memory. I have a RHDS directory with over 120K users and I have 100% caching enabled...for about 3G of RAM. My response time is usually under 15 mils and the average cpu utilization is only around 4% at it's peak. ? Also, just from a cost perspective I would say RHDS or Fedora DS is a much much much better bargain then AD. I would only use AD if I was doing a windows network or using some other Microsoft centric technology. ----- Original Message ---- From: "fedora-directory-users-request at redhat.com" <fedora-directory-users-request at redhat.com> To: fedora-directory-users at redhat.com Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 12:00:08 PM Subject: Fedora-directory-users Digest, Vol 39, Issue 21 Send Fedora-directory-users mailing list submissions to ??? fedora-directory-users at redhat.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit ??? https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ??? fedora-directory-users-request at redhat.com You can reach the person managing the list at ??? fedora-directory-users-owner at redhat.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Fedora-directory-users digest..." Today's Topics: ? 1. RE: Business Case: Advantage??? OpensourceDirectory VS Active ? ? ? Directory (ben.van.veen at planet.nl) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 08:30:25 +0200 From: <ben.van.veen at planet.nl> Subject: RE: Business Case: Advantage ??? OpensourceDirectory VS Active Directory To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project." ??? <fedora-directory-users at redhat.com> Message-ID: ??? <A0EE65E19A1F274DB66934B65F8ECCB402A47E80 at CPEXBE-EML21.kpnsp.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Hi William, One of the things you need to address is the performance / speed of authentication.? Can your (AD -) server forest handle the amount of new kind of authentication requests beside the WINS / DNS etc.? I have? 2-servers ( in replica) of Fedora DS (FDS) with over 800k users. This is only for authentication of our website. There is also an read-only replica of the AD on it for internal use. Till now there is no performance issue. We decided to move to FDS due to the amount of external users. We did this only for performance. AD could do it as well. Ben. ________________________________ Van: fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com namens cobra at cobradevil.org Verzonden: ma 18-8-2008 16:09 Aan: fedora-directory-users at redhat.com Onderwerp: Business Case: Advantage OpensourceDirectory VS Active Directory Hello all, I have a question why i should use an opensource directory server for my opensource activities! I work for a large company! 70k users We have a large MS Windows based infrastructure win2k3 with winxp workstations. For our open source servers and workstations we thought to get an Opensource Directory server because of the specific options that Active Directory cannot deliver. But now i get a lot of people who say that active directory can do all of it! Can someone help me with getting the right arguments so i have a valid reason to create an opensource directory server? The things i wanna administer are: Sudoldap Freeipa based authentication/dns application management and probably a lot more! Please let me know! With kind regards, William van de Velde -- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/attachments/20080819/41f2d4de/attachment.html ------------------------------ -- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users End of Fedora-directory-users Digest, Vol 39, Issue 21 ****************************************************** -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20080819/ac3dfd3f/attachment.html
