Reinhard Nappert wrote: > No, it does not. It looks like you need a value. > What if you shutdown, delete that entry completely from dse.ldif, then restart? > So, I installed a 64 bit version from scratch, took that generated value > in the migrated dse.ldif and started the server. This works, however it > is kind of ugly. Now, this brings up another question: If I do something > like that (with perl?), do I screw up my replication agreements? > > -Reinhard > > -----Original Message----- > From: fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com > [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Rich > Megginson > Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 10:19 AM > To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. > Subject: Re: Is it possibleto migrateBerkeley > 4.2(32bit) based directory to 4.2 (64bit) > > Reinhard Nappert wrote: > >> Rick, >> >> It looks like it is ok just using the same old data and point to the >> db directory. However, I experienced one hick-up. During the migration >> > > >> of the config data (dse.ldif) within migrate-ds.pl, the migration of >> the nsstate attribute for the uniqueid generator fails. When starting >> the directory, I get: >> [03/Apr/2008:15:46:26 -0400] uuid - read_state: failed to get >> generator's state >> [03/Apr/2008:15:46:26 -0400] uuid - uuid_init: failed to get >> generator's state >> [03/Apr/2008:15:46:26 -0400] uniqueid generator - uniqueIDGenInit: >> generator ini >> tialization failed >> >> Do you have any idea? >> >> > Yes. Unfortunately, that attribute contains raw binary data that may > not be 64-bit clean. If you shutdown the server, delete that attribute, > and start the server, does it work? > >> -Reinhard >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com >> [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Rich >> Megginson >> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 1:30 PM >> To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. >> Subject: Re: Is it possible to >> > migrateBerkeley > >> 4.2(32bit) based directory to 4.2 (64bit) >> >> Reinhard Nappert wrote: >> >> >>> Thanks Rick, >>> >>> You are saying, I have to export it at first. >>> >>> Initially, I just built 1.1 in 32bit mode (with the identical db >>> library). With that, I even was just using the same directory and it >>> worked fine. So, I guess I have to go the export/import way. >>> >>> >>> >> I'm just really not sure. I don't think we write any longs or other >> 64-bit values to the database with 1.1. So it may just work and be >> fine. >> >> >>> Cheers, >>> -Reinhard >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com >>> [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Rich >>> Megginson >>> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 12:12 PM >>> To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. >>> Subject: Re: Is it possible to migrate >>> Berkeley >>> 4.2(32bit) based directory to 4.2 (64bit) >>> >>> Reinhard Nappert wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Does anyone know, if that works? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Are you talking about the migration script migrate-ds-admin.pl? If >>> so, then yes. You will first have to export your databases to ldif >>> e.g. for a Fedora DS 1.0.4 installation: >>> cd /opt/fedora-ds/slapd-instance/db >>> ../db2ldif -n userRoot -a `pwd`/userRoot.ldif ../db2ldif -n >>> NetscapeRoot -a `pwd`/NetscapeRoot.ldif ... repeat for each database >>> instance >>> >>> The migration script will look for a file called >>> /opt/fedora-ds/slapd-instance/db/<db instance name>.ldif and use that >>> > > >>> rather than the binary files. >>> >>> You should also run the migration script with the -x option to force >>> it to use cross platform mode. >>> >>> >>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> -Reinhard >>>> >>>> >>>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> - >>>> -- >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Fedora-directory-users mailing list >>>> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com >>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> Fedora-directory-users mailing list >>> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >>> >>> >>> >> -- >> Fedora-directory-users mailing list >> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >> >> > > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3245 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20080404/0b4b141b/attachment.bin
