Andr? Lu?s Lopes wrote: > Hello Richard, > > Richard Megginson escreveu: >> The biggest difference right now is that FDS 1.0.x uses Apache for >> the Admin Server (http engine) instead of NES used in RHDS 7.1. >> Aside from that, all of the major features are the same. > > Ok, that's fine. When you say the "biggest difference" does that > mean that there are others differences other than the one you have > mentioned above ? Mostly bug fixes. Another difference is that FDS 1.0.4 includes mozldap6, which provides SASL client functionality for the mozldap ldapsearch, ldapmodify, etc. But SASL functionality is already provided by the openldap command line tools in /usr/bin. So that will probably not be an important distinction. > Also, do you know if there's some place (a website, a wiki, > whatever) where I could find a list of these differences, if any ? There is no such list AFAIK. From the end user and admin point of view, RHDS is identical to FDS. The only way to know for sure would be to do a cvs diff between the RHDS branch and the FDS 1.0.4 release tag. > > Regards, > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3245 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20070524/f15b8300/attachment.bin
