Andr? Lu?s Lopes wrote: > Hello Aaron, > > Bliss, Aaron escreveu: >> Andre, >> I was told by an rhce from RedHat (we were in the same boat that your >> in almost 1 year ago) that there is not any difference between fds >> and rds, other than the redhat logos have been removed from the fds >> version. > > First of all, sorry for replying so late, I was really very busy > these days. Nice to know that someone from Red Hat confirmed that bot > FDS and RHDS are technnically identical. > > I would like to ask you something : You wrote that you was in the > same boat I'm now almost one year ago. Since then, have you deployed > RHDS already ? Does it worked exactly as you tought it would work > based on your tests using FDS ? > > What I'm most concerned with is some potential feature lacking in > RHDS (as FDS seems to be updated more frequently than RHDS and I'm > testing using the latest FDS version, 1.0.4) compared to FDS, as I'm > testing with FDS and would like to deploy RHDS later. The biggest difference right now is that FDS 1.0.x uses Apache for the Admin Server (http engine) instead of NES used in RHDS 7.1. Aside from that, all of the major features are the same. > > Also, if someone from Red Hat is reading this message and would > like to comment on this, please, be welcome to give your comments. > > Regards, > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3245 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20070524/86eff675/attachment.bin
