Replication Possibilities

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eddie C wrote:

> I can not give an authoritative answer, but if your active directory 
> is 2003 server your active directory itself is multimaster ( no more 
> PDC and SDC ). It seems theorically possible to install active 
> directory sync on both nodes but leave it running only on one domain 
> controller. Something like this:
>  
>  
> AD2 <-> AD1
>         |
> LoadBalancer 
>         |
> FD2 <->FD1
>  

This is a cool idea, but it may not work because FDS uses the
AD sync control to perform incremental inbound updates.
It's quite likely that the two AD servers would have different
states for the sync cookie. You could work around this
by initiating a full sync when failing over between ADs.





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Apps]     [Maemo Users]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux