Richard Megginson wrote: > Daryle A. Tilroe wrote: > >> Rob Crittenden wrote: >> >>> Try the FC6 build instead. The problem is that RHEL4 uses Apache >>> 2.0.52 and RHEL 5 uses Apache 2.2.3. Their API's are not completely >>> compatible and modules need to be recompiled. >> >> Just a quick followup on this. I am going to try it myself soon. >> Is the FC6 build actually the correct one > > Yes. > >> or will there be a >> "proper" FDS 1.0.4 rpm for RHEL5 64bit at any point in the near >> future? >> > Probably only if there is some problem with the FC6 binary on RHEL5. Thanks for the clarification! I'll be sure to give the community a shout if I find any issues. -- Daryle A. Tilroe
