Daryle A. Tilroe wrote: > Rob Crittenden wrote: > >> Try the FC6 build instead. The problem is that RHEL4 uses Apache >> 2.0.52 and RHEL 5 uses Apache 2.2.3. Their API's are not completely >> compatible and modules need to be recompiled. > > Just a quick followup on this. I am going to try it myself soon. > Is the FC6 build actually the correct one Yes. > or will there be a > "proper" FDS 1.0.4 rpm for RHEL5 64bit at any point in the near > future? > Probably only if there is some problem with the FC6 binary on RHEL5. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3245 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20070626/89cae43a/attachment.bin
