I was under the impression FDS was better implementation than OpenLDAP in terms of Performance, Reliability, and especially replication? On 7/21/07, Gordon Messmer <yinyang at eburg.com> wrote: > > Richard Megginson wrote: > > Vampire D wrote: > >> As I understand it, OpenLDAP doesn't perform all that well under a > >> high load. > > OpenLDAP 2.3 does. > > Howard Chu's "SambaXP" key notes certainly seem to make that argument. > He makes the bold claim that "OpenLDAP is the only directory software > that matters." > > Do you agree? Is there a future for Fedora DS, or will OpenLDAP own the > Free Software directory service market? Will the two projects share > technology and converge? > > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > -- "Do the actors on Unsolved Mysteries ever get arrested because they look just like the criminal they are playing?" Christopher -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20070721/e523134a/attachment.html
