Richard Megginson wrote: > Vampire D wrote: >> As I understand it, OpenLDAP doesn't perform all that well under a >> high load. > OpenLDAP 2.3 does. Howard Chu's "SambaXP" key notes certainly seem to make that argument. He makes the bold claim that "OpenLDAP is the only directory software that matters." Do you agree? Is there a future for Fedora DS, or will OpenLDAP own the Free Software directory service market? Will the two projects share technology and converge?
