Dear All, After a successful c. 3 month trial period of using Multi-Master (*4) replication (RHEL4) on our test networks we are planning to progress to live operation in the near term. Since this trial went a little too well (.healthy paranoia!?) I would welcome any feedback with respect to other users' experiences with live operation, for example: 1) Your preferred approach to replacing a Master DS after underlying hardware failure, in terms of ensuring that recovery from the other three Masters is indeed achieved in a very timely manner (e.g. usage of any variants on forced replication updates?). 2) Replication degradation and eventual recovery where the intermediate network links degrade appreciably or are completely lost for a significant period, before returning and allowing the replication to recover. Thanks in advance! Regards, Kevin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20070126/8e512949/attachment.html
