Ankur Agarwal wrote: > As suggested I ran ldapsearch command : > > ./ldapsearch -p 8001 -b "cn=schema" -s base "objectclass=subschema" > > and I am able to see my new class name and attributes in the output. > Hence look like my ldapmodify command to modify schema had run fine. > > What else could be the issue behind this new class and attributes not > being visible? Where are they not visible? If ldapsearch says that they are there, then they are there. > > Thanks, > Ankur > > */Richard Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com>/* wrote: > > Ankur Agarwal wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have a ldif file for adding new attributes and objectClass. I use > > ldapmodify command and i am able to add attributes and > objectclass on > > my dev and test environments. However when i run ldapmodify on Prod > > env (having master-master setup), command runs fine, status > shows OK > > but schema modification do not get reflected. > On the master you added them to, or the other master? If you do a > search of cn=schema do you see your new schema? > > Since there are no error shown during script execution i am not > able > > to figure out the cause. > Also check the access and error logs. You should see the MOD request > when you added the schema and you can find out the result. > > > > Strangely 99user.ldif file shows these new attributes but still > I dont > > see these added using LDAP browser. > 99user.ldif on the original master or the other master? Do you > need to > refresh your ldap browser or even possibly restart it for the schema > changes to be reflected? Please use ldapsearch to verify the contents > of cn=schema. > > > > Do I need to follow different steps for master-master set-up? Or is > > there some other mechanism to modify schema for this set-up? > > > > regards, > > Ankur > > > > > > Schema ldif contents are as given below: > > ================== > > dn: cn=schema > > changetype: modify > > add: objectClasses > > objectClasses: ( coltOnlineUser-oid NAME 'testOnlineUser' SUP > > inetorgperson STRUCTURAL MUST ( c $ isPartner $ isPasswordLocked $ > > preferredContactMethod ) MAY ( address1 $ address2 $ belongsToOCN $ > > city $ isDeleted $ isMemberOf $ nsAccountLock $ status ) X-ORIGIN > > 'user defined' ) > > - > > add: attributeTypes > > attributeTypes: ( isMemberOf-oid NAME 'isMemberOf' SYNTAX > > 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.12 X-ORIGIN 'user defined' ) > > - > > add: attributeTypes > > attributeTypes: ( address1-oid NAME 'address1' SYNTAX > > 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.26 SINGLE-VALUE X-ORIGIN 'user defined' ) > > - > > add: attributeTypes > > attributeTypes: ( belongsToOCN-oid NAME 'belongsToOCN' SYNTAX > > 1.3.6.1.4.1.146 6.115.121.1.15 SINGLE-VALUE X-ORIGIN 'user > defined' ) > > - > > add: attributeTypes > > attributeTypes: ( isPasswordLocked-oid NAME 'isPasswordLocked' > SYNTAX > > 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27 SINGLE-VALUE X-ORIGIN 'user defined' ) > > - > > add: attributeTypes > > attributeTypes: ( address2-oid NAME 'address2' SYNTAX > > 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.26 SINGLE-VALUE X-ORIGIN 'user defined' ) > > - > > add: attributeTypes > > attributeTypes: ( preferredContactMethod-oid NAME > > 'preferredContactMethod' SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.26 > > SINGLE-VALUE X-ORIGIN 'user defined' ) > > - > > add: attributeTypes > > attributeTypes: ( city-oid NAME 'city' SYNTAX > > 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.26 SINGLE-VALUE X-ORIGIN 'user defined' ) > > - > > add: attributeTypes > > attributeTypes: ( isDeleted-oid NAME 'isDeleted' DESC 'Whether the > > user is deleted from the system or not.' SYNTAX > > 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.7 SINGLE-VALUE X-ORIGIN 'user defined' ) > > - > > add: attributeTypes > > attributeTypes: ( isPartner-oid NAME 'isPartner' SYNTAX > > 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27 SINGLE-VALUE X-ORIGIN 'user defined' ) > > - > > add: attributeTypes > > attributeTypes: ( status-oid NAME 'status' SYNTAX > > 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.26 SINGLE-VALUE X-ORIGIN 'user defined' ) > > > > ================== > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Food fight? > > > > Enjoy some healthy debate > > in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A. > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > -- > > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Sucker-punch spam > <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=49981/*http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/features_spam.html> > with award-winning protection. > Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta. > <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=49981/*http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/features_spam.html> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3245 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20070228/9d6b92cc/attachment.bin
