Bliss, Aaron wrote: > I should mention that I didn't run setup after upgrading the rpm; is > this necessary? Thanks. > Yes. Please read http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Release_Notes : Finally, run setup as follows: cd /opt/fedora-ds ; ./setup/setup > Aaron > > -----Original Message----- > From: fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com > [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Bliss, > Aaron > Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 12:07 PM > To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. > Subject: RE: Preparing to upgrade to fds 1.0.4 > > Well, I checked out the release notes, and disabled all syntax checking > in all password policies before upgrading; upgrade seems to have gone > okay, however I'm not unable to log into the directory server console; > directory server is running: > ldap 32287 7.7 2.3 522820 24416 ? Sl 12:01 0:00 > /ns-slapd -D /opt/fedora-ds/slapd-al-lnx-s11 -i > /opt/fedora-ds/slapd-al-lnx-s11/logs/pid -w > root 32374 1.0 0.3 35372 3256 ? Ssl 12:02 0:00 > /usr/sbin//httpd.worker -k start -d /opt/fedora-ds/admin-serv -f > /opt/fedora-ds/admin-serv/co > root 32376 0.0 0.1 35356 1672 ? S 12:02 0:00 > /usr/sbin//httpd.worker -k start -d /opt/fedora-ds/admin-serv -f > /opt/fedora-ds/admin-serv/co > ldap 32379 4.0 0.4 704088 4928 ? Sl 12:02 0:00 > /usr/sbin//httpd.worker -k start -d /opt/fedora-ds/admin-serv -f > /opt/fedora-ds/admin-serv/co > > I can however login with the built-in admin account; I'm also able to > still log into the console on the slave directory server (which is still > running fds 1.0.2); login error is error 401 Authorization required; > next line displays status 401. Queries to the server seem to be okay; > It seems almost as if the console either isn't searching the proper > directory (like it's searching the Netscape directory name space or the > console has lost the configuration piece that allows my uid to login); I > remember setting this thru the console way back when I originally setup > fds, however I can't find where that option is thru the gui; any ideas > how to further troubleshoot? Thanks. > > Aaron > > -----Original Message----- > From: fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com > [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Richard > Megginson > Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 10:41 AM > To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. > Subject: Re: Preparing to upgrade to fds 1.0.4 > > Bliss, Aaron wrote: > >> Hi everyone >> I'm currently running fds 1.0.2 on 2 redhat boxes (a master and a >> slave); are there any gotchas that I should look out for before >> upgrading to 1.0.4? Can I go directly to this release, or do I need >> to first upgrade to .3? Thanks for your help. >> >> > You can go directly from .2 to .4. > > Be sure to read the release notes - > http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Release_Notes - and follow the > directions there. > >> Aaron >> >> Confidentiality Notice: >> The information contained in this electronic message is intended for >> the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may >> contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this >> > > >> message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent >> responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby >> notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this >> information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in >> > > >> error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy >> the copies you received. >> >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> -- >> Fedora-directory-users mailing list >> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >> >> > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3245 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20070219/648ed216/attachment.bin