Philip Kime wrote: >> No. Can you post the last few lines from your errors and access logs? >> > > Well, part of the problem is that this server gets so hammered - 99.9% > CPU devoted to nslapd all the time, that the access logs roll over so > quickly, I don't have them any more. According to the FDSgraph charts > (which are messed up because I think it's so busy, the graphs are just a > patchwork of points which aren't joined up), Ok. Then, how about the error log? > it does about 70k ops per > minutes, peaking at about 140k. What are the clients? OS login? > This suddenly shot up a few weeks ago > and nobody seems to know why so I'm assuming that the load is the > problem. I was thinking about increasing the mem cache for FDS - worth > trying? It seems to be at the default (10 Meg?) and this box has easily > 3Gb doing nothing at any one time. > The mem cache should only be large enough to hold all of the entries/indexes in your database - any more than that is not used. You could try increasing it, but I doubt it will help. > PK > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3245 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20070404/ded2e2e9/attachment.bin
