Hi all, I successfully connect the AD Back End DB to FDS like Brian Smith, i disable the nsProxiedAuthorization (comment by Richard Meggison) in Plugins->Chaining Database->AD (is the name of my Sub Suffix), but i cant Browse the Directory "Critical Extension unavailable". - In the Console i can search Users, Groups of my AD and FDS =) Happy!! Two Questions: Its possible to Map the Attributes like: map attribute uid sAMAaccountname map attribute cn name map attribute mail userprincipalname map attribute account user Its possible to Link the Database of the AD only for Read ? I like to write a Howto for this settings. Regards, Sergio On 10/2/06, Richard Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com> wrote: > > It may be that AD doesn't support proxied auth, in which case you should > tell chaining to disable it. See > http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/dir-server/ag/7.1/entry_dist.html#21180 > for more information - the pertinent attribute is nsProxiedAuthorization > > Brian Smith wrote: > > All, > > Here's what I've now done to enable the AD Back end DB for a sub tree: > > 1. Click configuration and select the "dc=domain,dc=com" tree. > > 2. Right click "dc=domain,dc=com" tree and select new sub suffix > > 3. In New Suffix box, typed "ou=subsuffix1" and unchecked create > > associated database automatically and click OK. > > 4. Open "dc=domain,dc=com" and right click > > "ou=subsuffix1,dc=domain,dc=com, and select "new database link. > > 5. Here, I put Database link name "subsuffix1", put the bind dn and > > password of a domain user account in my AD, and put the domain > > controller ip in the remote server box and clicked save. (I can > > connect to my AD with the DN I provided here) > > 6. Check enable this suffix under ou=subsuffix1,dc=worldpub,dc=corp > > > > now subsuffix1 database appears under ou=subsuffix1,dc=domain,dc=com. > > If I now go to the directory tab, and select the directory entry, i > > get critical extension unavailable and if i use an ldap browser i get > > list failed on the main tree. Did i miss a step? If I disable the > > ou=subsuffix1,dc=domain,dc=com suffix i can browse the tree no > > problem. Thanks! > > Brian Smith > > > > > > > > Sergio Diaz wrote: > >> > >> FDS, OpenLDAP and AD > >> > >> One Directory FDS.....i want this directions to... > >> Chaining Backend... > >> > >> Regards, > >> Sergio > >> > >> On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 14:12 -0400, Brian Smith wrote: > >>> Hello all, I've been working on getting chaining working with an > active > >>> directory back end for a week now. Has anyone successfully done this > or > >>> have directions on setting this up? > >>> > >>> Brian Smith > >>> > >>> Howard Chu wrote: > >>> > > >>> >> Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 10:01:55 -0600 > >>> >> From: Richard Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com <mailto: > rmeggins at redhat.com>> > >>> > > >>> >> Sergio Diaz wrote: > >>> >>> Hi Richard; > >>> >>> > >>> >>> Openldap: > >>> >>> > >>> >>> The *meta* backend to *slapd(8) > >>> >>> < > http://docsrv.caldera.com:8457/cgi-bin/man?mansearchword=slapd&mansection=8< > http://docsrv.caldera.com:8457/cgi-bin/man?mansearchword=slapd&mansection=8 > >>* > >>> >>> performs basic LDAP proxying with respect > >>> >>> to a set of remote LDAP servers, called "targets". The > >>> >>> information > >>> >>> contained in these servers can be presented as belonging > >>> >>> to a single > >>> >>> Directory Information Tree (DIT). > >>> >>> > >>> >>> Its possible with FDS ?? > >>> >>> > >>> >> FDS has a chaining backend which allows you to use another LDAP > >>> >> server to store the data. > >>> > > >>> > It sounds like the FDS chaining backend is similar to OpenLDAP > >>> > back-ldap and/or the chaining overlay. In OpenLDAP back-ldap > forwards > >>> > a request to one other server (at a time; multiple servers can be > >>> > configured but the others will only be used if the first server > cannot > >>> > be contacted). The back-meta backend is a superset of back-ldap, it > >>> > can fanout single requests to multiple servers in parallel and > >>> > aggregate the results. (There's also attribute mapping and DN > >>> > rewriting, but those capabilities are no longer unique to back-meta, > >>> > having been moved into the rewrite overlay.) With these modules you > >>> > can stitch together a variety of heterogeneous directories into a > >>> > coherent virtual directory. > >>> > > >>> >>> Regards!! > >>> >>> Sergio > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 07:25 -0600, Richard Megginson wrote: > >>> >>>> Sergio Diaz wrote: > >>> >>>>> Hi People, > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> Its Possible Sync only in One Way ? > >>> >>>>> Users Windows AD -> FDS. > >>> >>>> No, not really. > >>> >>>>> Or the other scenario its like OpenLDAP have a Meta Backend (2 > >>> >>>>> LDAPs, 1 AD), its possible with FDS ? > >>> >>>> It's possible. What does the meta backend do? > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> Regards, > >>> >>>>> Sergio > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Fedora-directory-users mailing list > >>> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com <mailto: > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com> > >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > >>> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > -- > > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > > > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20061013/9c1fb30d/attachment.html
