George Holbert wrote: >> >> I guess my question is can I use Sun directory server on >> one box as master, then another box (doing the multi-master replication) >> running fedora directory? > > My understanding is that would not work. You would want all servers > running either SunDS or FDS. FDS replication is compatible with SunDS 5.1 and earlier replication. I believe SunDS 5.2 has some sort of legacy replication mode that lets it talk to SunDS 5.1. So it is possible. > > > > James Greene wrote: >> I can do that, but I guess my question is can I use Sun directory >> server on >> one box as master, then another box (doing the multi-master replication) >> running fedora directory? I know they both are based on the same >> code, but >> not sure if that would work or not. >> >> >> On 10/11/06 4:07 PM, "Scott Roberts" <rinconsystems at yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> >>> Why? I know I will get kicked in the face for >>> mentioning this... but the major OS's have their own >>> directory servers, Red Hat has one now as we all know, >>> and Sun has one too. Just use the sun directory server >>> on solaris, its free, the support is not. >>> >>> --- James Greene <jwgreene at megalink.net> wrote: >>> > > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3178 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20061011/6d85dfb6/attachment.bin
