Jason Russler wrote: > This is, in a way, entirely inconsequential from a functional > stand-point but: > I performed an upgrade from 1.0.2 to1.0.3. The upgrade went fine > (except the permissions on ~/slapd-blah/config and ~/slapd-blah/logs > had to be changed back to what they were suppose to be) but when I > start the console it shows a directory server version number of > 1.0.2. Where is it getting that? > /opt/fedora-ds/bin/slapd/server/ns-slapd showes > Fedora-Directory/1.0.3 B2006.303.1845. I think it's because when you get the permission problem during setup (are you using SSL at all?), the upgrade process doesn't upgrade the ds version that the console uses. The authoritative version is the one reported by ns-slapd. > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3178 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20061106/2625086c/attachment.bin
