Chris St. Pierre wrote: > I went ahead and re-inited pretty much all of my replication > agreements, and now I'm getting the error below on the other three > servers, but not on the one that originally had the problem. Do I > just need to keep re-initing agreements until I hit the magic > combination? Is there a better solution? (Please say yes!) > Once you reinitialize one, you have to reinitialize the others. I'm afraid I can't offer a better solution because I don't understand why this happened in the first place. > Chris St. Pierre > Unix Systems Administrator > Nebraska Wesleyan University > > On Fri, 3 Nov 2006, Chris St. Pierre wrote: > > >> On Fri, 3 Nov 2006, Richard Megginson wrote: >> >> >>> The consumer. The supplier thinks the consumer suffix is disabled. It might >>> be as simple a fix as restarting the consumer. >>> >> That changed the error message. >> >> [03/Nov/2006:11:21:24 -0600] NSMMReplicationPlugin - >> agmt="cn="Replication to chico.nebrwesleyan.edu"" (chico:389): Replica >> has a different generation ID than the local data. >> >> I get that every 3-5 seconds WRT replication to the same host. When I >> restarted the problematic host, it reinitialized all of its >> replication agreements; do I need to reinitialize the agreement the >> other way, too? >> >> Chris St. Pierre >> Unix Systems Administrator >> Nebraska Wesleyan University >> >> >> -- >> Fedora-directory-users mailing list >> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >> >> > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3178 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20061103/e313312e/attachment.bin
