Multiple database links (chaining)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ben Steeves wrote:
> On 5/29/06, Richard Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> > On a test server, I've set up a "master" suffix, "dc=com", and created
>> > directory links to "dc=one,dc=com" and "dc=two,dc=com".  I've added
>> > the proxy ACI on the One and Two LDAP directories.  When I search the
>> > test server, I can successfully find objects in the One tree, so it's
>> > half working -- but the Two tree doesn't work.  I've check and
>> > re-checked and everything appears kosher.
>> Does the other LDAP server have dc=com and two sub suffixes
>> dc=one,dc=com and dc=two,dc=com?  Each with their own "real" database?
>
> Thanks for taking the time to reply, Richard...
>
> The server with the real databases has two suffixes: "dc=one,dc=com"
> and "dc=two,dc=com".  "dc=com" doesn't exist.  Both suffixes have real
> databaes and work if I query them individually.
>
> I wouldn't be so frustrated if nothing was working, but the fact that
> searching with a base of "dc=com" for a UID that appears in
> "dc=one,dc=com" works but searching for a UID that appears in
> "dc=two,dc=com" doesn't is what's really bugging me.  I went so far as
> deleting the "dc=one,dc=com" link, but the Two link still doesn't
> work, even if it's the only one.  The root ACIs on One and Two are
> exactly the same (with the obvious changes for the different suffixes
> of course).
You could try enabling the trace level logging and the plugin level 
logging for the error log - perhaps there is a clue in the error log.
>
>> >
>> > Am I barking up the wrong tree?  Is there an easier way to do this?
>> > Should I give up and take up basket weaving as a nice, harmless job,
>> > and forget systems administration altogether?
>> It's difficult to say for sure without reviewing all of your 
>> configuration.
>
> Anything semi-specific you'd be curious about?
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3178 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20060531/510394fa/attachment.bin 


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Apps]     [Maemo Users]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux