Ben Steeves wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I'm having a problem that I'm going to go bald trying to solve, it > seems... > > I've been tasked with creating a single searchable suffix for two > different trees (dc=one,dc=com and dc=two,dc=com for arguments sake). > The application that needs this suffix doesn't deal with referals, so > my first (and the obvious, I thought) solution won't work. > > I delved into the Administrator's Guide and discovered the section on > chained suffixes (ie., Directory Links), and it seems good. The > problem? I can't make it work right. > > On a test server, I've set up a "master" suffix, "dc=com", and created > directory links to "dc=one,dc=com" and "dc=two,dc=com". I've added > the proxy ACI on the One and Two LDAP directories. When I search the > test server, I can successfully find objects in the One tree, so it's > half working -- but the Two tree doesn't work. I've check and > re-checked and everything appears kosher. Does the other LDAP server have dc=com and two sub suffixes dc=one,dc=com and dc=two,dc=com? Each with their own "real" database? > > Am I barking up the wrong tree? Is there an easier way to do this? > Should I give up and take up basket weaving as a nice, harmless job, > and forget systems administration altogether? It's difficult to say for sure without reviewing all of your configuration. > > Any help or suggestions would be appreciated. > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3178 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20060529/e245c285/attachment.bin
