Bliss, Aaron wrote: >I've been able to reproduce; after setting the new password policy >(require 1 digit, 1 special, etc) and then I attempt to use a password >that isn't compliant, this error is logged and the users new password is >not accepted. >[13/Mar/2006:22:19:42 -0500] conn=1073 op=10 RESULT err=19 tag=103 >nentries=0 etime=0 > > Can you find out what this operation is? It's either an ADD or MOD - just search before that line for "conn=1073 op=10". I'd like to know what the DN is. >So, it looks like everything is working like it is suppose to....it's >still interesting that I received that error during the upgrade.... > >Aaron > >-----Original Message----- >From: fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com >[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Bliss, >Aaron >Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 10:04 PM >To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. >Subject: RE: Getting ready to upgrade from fds >1.0.1 to 1.0.2 > >It only seems to be in the access log 1 time; looks like it only >happened during the upgrade >[13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=11 RESULT err=19 tag=103 >nentries=0 etime=0 Is there an easy way to verify that the new password >schema is being used? > >Thanks. >Aaron > >-----Original Message----- >From: fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com >[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Richard >Megginson >Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 9:54 PM >To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. >Cc: Bliss, Aaron >Subject: Re: Getting ready to upgrade from fds >1.0.1 to 1.0.2 > >Bliss, Aaron wrote: > > > >>Well, I upgraded the fds rpm; after a reboot all looks okay, however I >>noticed this information in the setup logfile; is this indicative that >>something failed to update properly? Perhaps the new schema files? >>How can I verify that the new schema files are in use? Thanks very >>much. >> >>Start Slapd Starting Slapd server reconfiguration. >>Fatal Slapd ERROR: Could not update Directory Server Instance URL >>ldap://fds1.preferredcare.org:389/o=NetscapeRoot user id admin DN >>cn=slapd-al-lnx-s11,cn=Fedora Directory Server,cn=Server >>Group,cn=fds1.preferredcare.org,ou=preferredcare.org,o=NetscapeRoot >>(19:Constraint violation) >>Configuring Administration Server... >>InstallInfo: Apache Directory "ApacheDir" is missing. >> >>The proper fds version is disaplyed in the display console, and the new >> >> > > > >>password enforcement options seem to be available. >> >> >> >> >Check your directory server access log - look for err=19 - constraint >violation - to see which operation it's complaining about. > > > >>Aaron >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Bliss, Aaron >>Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 2:08 PM >>To: 'General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.' >>Subject: RE: Getting ready to upgrade from fds >>1.0.1 to 1.0.2 >> >>Ah, thanks again. >> >>Aaron >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com >>[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Richard >> >> > > > >>Megginson >>Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 2:08 PM >>To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. >>Subject: Re: Getting ready to upgrade from fds >>1.0.1 to 1.0.2 >> >>Bliss, Aaron wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>>Thanks; just so I understand, I have to run the setup script even >>>though my databases have already been configured? I did not have to >>>do >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>this on my test box in order to upgrade. Thanks. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>Setup will copy in the new schema files required to use the new >>password syntax checking, so if you skip that, you'll have to copy them >> >> > > > >>in manually. Setup will also make sure the console reports the correct >> >> > > > >>version of directory server. >> >> >> >> >> >>>Aaron >>> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com >>>[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of >>>Richard >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>Megginson >>>Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 1:59 PM >>>To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. >>>Subject: Re: Getting ready to upgrade from >>>fds >>>1.0.1 to 1.0.2 >>> >>>Bliss, Aaron wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>I'm planning on upgrading both my supplier and consumer fds servers >>>>tonight; do I need to worry about their server certificates? I'll >>>>just >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>be running rpm -Uvh fedora....Thanks very much. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>Upgrade shouldn't touch any ssl information. >>> >>>After doing the rpm -U, do cd /opt/fedora-ds ; ./setup/setup and >>>follow >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>the prompts. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>Aaron >>>> >>>>www.preferredcare.org >>>>"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. >>>> >>>> > > > >>>>Power and Associates >>>> >>>>Confidentiality Notice: >>>>The information contained in this electronic message is intended for >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may >>>contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this >>> >>> > > > >>>message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent >>>responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby >>>notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this >>>information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in >>> >>> > > > >>>error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy >>>the copies you received. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>-- >>>>Fedora-directory-users mailing list >>>>Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com >>>>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>www.preferredcare.org >>>"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. >>>Power and Associates >>> >>>Confidentiality Notice: >>>The information contained in this electronic message is intended for >>> >>> >>> >>> >>the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may >>contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this >>message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent >>responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby >>notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this >>information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in >>error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy >>the copies you received. >> >> >> >> >>>-- >>>Fedora-directory-users mailing list >>>Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com >>>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>www.preferredcare.org >>"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. >>Power and Associates >> >>Confidentiality Notice: >>The information contained in this electronic message is intended for >> >> >the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may >contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this >message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent >responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby >notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this information >is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please >notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy the copies you >received. > > >>-- >>Fedora-directory-users mailing list >>Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com >>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >> >> >> >> > > >www.preferredcare.org >"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. >Power and Associates > >Confidentiality Notice: >The information contained in this electronic message is intended for the >exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may contain >privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this message >is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible to >deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that >dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is >prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please >notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy the copies you >received. > > >-- >Fedora-directory-users mailing list >Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > >-- >Fedora-directory-users mailing list >Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3178 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20060314/e0ba997e/attachment.bin
