I've been able to reproduce; after setting the new password policy (require 1 digit, 1 special, etc) and then I attempt to use a password that isn't compliant, this error is logged and the users new password is not accepted. [13/Mar/2006:22:19:42 -0500] conn=1073 op=10 RESULT err=19 tag=103 nentries=0 etime=0 So, it looks like everything is working like it is suppose to....it's still interesting that I received that error during the upgrade.... Aaron -----Original Message----- From: fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Bliss, Aaron Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 10:04 PM To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. Subject: RE: Getting ready to upgrade from fds 1.0.1 to 1.0.2 It only seems to be in the access log 1 time; looks like it only happened during the upgrade [13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=11 RESULT err=19 tag=103 nentries=0 etime=0 Is there an easy way to verify that the new password schema is being used? Thanks. Aaron -----Original Message----- From: fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Richard Megginson Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 9:54 PM To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. Cc: Bliss, Aaron Subject: Re: Getting ready to upgrade from fds 1.0.1 to 1.0.2 Bliss, Aaron wrote: >Well, I upgraded the fds rpm; after a reboot all looks okay, however I >noticed this information in the setup logfile; is this indicative that >something failed to update properly? Perhaps the new schema files? >How can I verify that the new schema files are in use? Thanks very >much. > >Start Slapd Starting Slapd server reconfiguration. >Fatal Slapd ERROR: Could not update Directory Server Instance URL >ldap://fds1.preferredcare.org:389/o=NetscapeRoot user id admin DN >cn=slapd-al-lnx-s11,cn=Fedora Directory Server,cn=Server >Group,cn=fds1.preferredcare.org,ou=preferredcare.org,o=NetscapeRoot >(19:Constraint violation) >Configuring Administration Server... >InstallInfo: Apache Directory "ApacheDir" is missing. > >The proper fds version is disaplyed in the display console, and the new >password enforcement options seem to be available. > > Check your directory server access log - look for err=19 - constraint violation - to see which operation it's complaining about. >Aaron >-----Original Message----- >From: Bliss, Aaron >Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 2:08 PM >To: 'General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.' >Subject: RE: Getting ready to upgrade from fds >1.0.1 to 1.0.2 > >Ah, thanks again. > >Aaron > >-----Original Message----- >From: fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com >[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Richard >Megginson >Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 2:08 PM >To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. >Subject: Re: Getting ready to upgrade from fds >1.0.1 to 1.0.2 > >Bliss, Aaron wrote: > > > >>Thanks; just so I understand, I have to run the setup script even >>though my databases have already been configured? I did not have to >>do >> >> > > > >>this on my test box in order to upgrade. Thanks. >> >> >> >> >Setup will copy in the new schema files required to use the new >password syntax checking, so if you skip that, you'll have to copy them >in manually. Setup will also make sure the console reports the correct >version of directory server. > > > >>Aaron >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com >>[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of >>Richard >> >> > > > >>Megginson >>Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 1:59 PM >>To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. >>Subject: Re: Getting ready to upgrade from >>fds >>1.0.1 to 1.0.2 >> >>Bliss, Aaron wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>>I'm planning on upgrading both my supplier and consumer fds servers >>>tonight; do I need to worry about their server certificates? I'll >>>just >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>be running rpm -Uvh fedora....Thanks very much. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>Upgrade shouldn't touch any ssl information. >> >>After doing the rpm -U, do cd /opt/fedora-ds ; ./setup/setup and >>follow >> >> > > > >>the prompts. >> >> >> >> >> >>>Aaron >>> >>>www.preferredcare.org >>>"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. >>>Power and Associates >>> >>>Confidentiality Notice: >>>The information contained in this electronic message is intended for >>> >>> >>> >>> >>the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may >>contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this >>message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent >>responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby >>notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this >>information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in >>error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy >>the copies you received. >> >> >> >> >>>-- >>>Fedora-directory-users mailing list >>>Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com >>>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>www.preferredcare.org >>"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. >>Power and Associates >> >>Confidentiality Notice: >>The information contained in this electronic message is intended for >> >> >the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may >contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this >message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent >responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby >notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this >information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in >error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy >the copies you received. > > >>-- >>Fedora-directory-users mailing list >>Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com >>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >> >> >> >> > > >www.preferredcare.org >"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. >Power and Associates > >Confidentiality Notice: >The information contained in this electronic message is intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy the copies you received. > > >-- >Fedora-directory-users mailing list >Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > www.preferredcare.org "An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. Power and Associates Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this electronic message is intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy the copies you received. -- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
