None. Look's like both ldif files define nisDomain with a different oid.
10rfc2307bis.ldif - attributetypes: ( 1.3.6.1.1.1.1.30 NAME 'nisDomain'
DESC 'NIS domain' SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.26{256} )
63nisDomain.ldif - attributeTypes: ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1.1.1.12 SUP name NAME
'nisDomain' DESC 'NIS domain' SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.26 )
Richard Megginson wrote:
> What other attribute type or objectclass is using OID
> 1.3.6.1.4.1.1.1.1.12?
>
> Roger Spencer wrote:
>
>> [31/Jan/2006:17:18:32 -0500] dse - The entry cn=schema in file
>> /opt/fedora-ds/slapd-auspice/config/schema/63nisDomain.ldif is
>> invalid, error code 20 (Type or value exists) - attribute type
>> nisDomain: Does not match the OID "1.3.6.1.4.1.1.1.1.12". Another
>> attribute type is already using the name or OID.
>>
>> 63nisDomain.ldif is (put in to support Solaris client):
>> dn: cn=schema
>> attributeTypes: ( 1.3.6.1.1.1.1.28 NAME 'nisPublickey' DESC
>> 'nisPublickey' EQUALITY caseIgnoreIA5Match SYNTAX
>> 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.26 )
>> attributeTypes: ( 1.3.6.1.1.1.1.29 NAME 'nisSecretkey' DESC
>> 'nisSecretkey' EQUALITY caseIgnoreIA5Match SYNTAX
>> 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.26 )
>> attributeTypes: ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1.1.1.12 SUP name NAME 'nisDomain' DESC
>> 'NIS domain' SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.26 )
>> attributeTypes: ( 2.16.840.1.113730.3.1.30 NAME
>> 'mgrpRFC822MailMember' DESC 'mgrpRFC822MailMember' EQUALITY
>> caseIgnoreIA5Match SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.26 )
>> attributeTypes: ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.42.2.27.1.1.12 NAME 'nisNetIdUser' DESC
>> 'nisNetIdUser' EQUALITY caseExactIA5Match SYNTAX
>> 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.26 )
>> attributeTypes: ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.42.2.27.1.1.13 NAME 'nisNetIdGroup'
>> DESC 'nisNetIdGroup' EQUALITY caseExactIA5Match SYNTAX
>> 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.26 )
>> attributeTypes: ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.42.2.27.1.1.14 NAME 'nisNetIdHost' DESC
>> 'nisNetIdHost' EQUALITY caseExactIA5Match SYNTAX
>> 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.26 )
>> objectClasses: ( 1.3.6.1.1.1.2.14 NAME 'NisKeyObject' DESC
>> 'NisKeyObject' SUP top MUST ( cn $ nisPublickey $ nisSecretkey ) MAY
>> ( uidNumber $ description ) )
>> objectClasses: ( 1.3.1.6.1.1.1.2.15 NAME 'nisDomainObject' DESC
>> 'nisDomainObject' SUP top AUXILIARY MUST ( nisDomain ) )
>> objectClasses: ( 2.16.840.1.113730.3.2.4 NAME 'mailGroup' DESC
>> 'mailGroup' SUP top MUST ( mail ) MAY ( cn $ mgrpRFC822MailMember ) )
>> objectClasses: ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.42.2.27.1.2.6 NAME 'nisNetId' DESC
>> 'nisNetId' SUP top MUST ( cn ) MAY ( nisNetIdUser $ nisNetIdGroup $
>> nisNetIdHost ) )
>> ~
>>
>> Can I get away with removing the oid from one of the files? Not sure
>> how touchy schema files are about where what is defined.
>>
>>
>>
>> Richard Megginson wrote:
>>
>>> Roger Spencer wrote:
>>>
>>>> I dug the below out from the archive. Is there anything new on the
>>>> subject?
>>>>
>>>> I've seemed to have slammed head first into the subject. Got SUSE
>>>> and RHEL 3 using nisObjects happily (apparently they'll support
>>>> either model). Just configured a Solaris 10 box as a client and it
>>>> wants automountMap. Even worse, Solaris 9 and 10 do automountMap,
>>>> Solaris 8 does nisObjects. Fortunately, I have all three versions
>>>> running. (Info on Solaris' automount:
>>>> http://www.informit.com/articles/article.asp?p=31550&seqNum=4&rl=1 )
>>>>
>>>> I tried loading the 10rfc2307bis.ldif (by replacing the
>>>> 10rfc2307.ldif file) and slapd wouldn't restart.
>>>
>>>
>>> What errors did you see in the errors log?
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Any idea to a) get the automountMap objects in the schema? b)
>>>> possibly support both models?
>>>>
>>>> * /From/: Rich Megginson <rmeggins redhat com>
>>>> * /To/: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server
>>>> project." <fedora-directory-users redhat com>
>>>> * /Subject/: Re: Re: automount
>>>> * /Date/: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 09:01:40 -0600
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> There has been a lot of confusion around this issue (mostly on my
>>>> part). I think one of the problems is that rfc2307 support from OS
>>>> vendors is now deprecated in favor of rfc2307bis
>>>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-howard-rfc2307bis-01.txt,
>>>> which is still in Internet Draft phase (and is due to expire very
>>>> quickly). A new draft is being worked on with the goal of
>>>> generating a new RFC. The bis draft has one problem with it, in
>>>> that it requires the use of the authPassword attribute (defined in
>>>> RFC 3112 http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3112.txt). FDS does not support
>>>> this (and neither does OpenLDAP AFAICT). I have attached a file
>>>> called 10rfc2307bis.ldif. This is the schema from the 2307bis I-D
>>>> in FDS schema format.
>>>>
>>>> The preferred way to map the automount information is to use the
>>>> automount attributes and objectclasses in the RFC 2307bis draft
>>>> schema. The problem is that I don't know all of the vendor support.
>>>> So far I've been unable to find out what RHEL3 and RHEL4 support.
>>>> I've been told that Solaris has support for the bis schema.
>>>>
>>>> If you like, you can replace the 10rfc2307.ldif schema supplied
>>>> with FDS with the attached file, and see what happens.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
>>>> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
>>> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>>>
>>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> --
>> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
>> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>>
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20060131/50f52e73/attachment.html
