Roger Spencer wrote: > I dug the below out from the archive. Is there anything new on the > subject? > > I've seemed to have slammed head first into the subject. Got SUSE and > RHEL 3 using nisObjects happily (apparently they'll support either > model). Just configured a Solaris 10 box as a client and it wants > automountMap. Even worse, Solaris 9 and 10 do automountMap, Solaris 8 > does nisObjects. Fortunately, I have all three versions running. > (Info on Solaris' automount: > http://www.informit.com/articles/article.asp?p=31550&seqNum=4&rl=1 ) > > I tried loading the 10rfc2307bis.ldif (by replacing the 10rfc2307.ldif > file) and slapd wouldn't restart. What errors did you see in the errors log? > > Any idea to a) get the automountMap objects in the schema? b) > possibly support both models? > > * /From/: Rich Megginson <rmeggins redhat com> > * /To/: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server > project." <fedora-directory-users redhat com> > * /Subject/: Re: Re: automount > * /Date/: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 09:01:40 -0600 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > There has been a lot of confusion around this issue (mostly on my > part). I think one of the problems is that rfc2307 support from OS > vendors is now deprecated in favor of rfc2307bis > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-howard-rfc2307bis-01.txt, > which is still in Internet Draft phase (and is due to expire very > quickly). A new draft is being worked on with the goal of generating a > new RFC. The bis draft has one problem with it, in that it requires > the use of the authPassword attribute (defined in RFC 3112 > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3112.txt). FDS does not support this (and > neither does OpenLDAP AFAICT). I have attached a file called > 10rfc2307bis.ldif. This is the schema from the 2307bis I-D in FDS > schema format. > > The preferred way to map the automount information is to use the > automount attributes and objectclasses in the RFC 2307bis draft > schema. The problem is that I don't know all of the vendor support. So > far I've been unable to find out what RHEL3 and RHEL4 support. I've > been told that Solaris has support for the bis schema. > > If you like, you can replace the 10rfc2307.ldif schema supplied with > FDS with the attached file, and see what happens. > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >-- >Fedora-directory-users mailing list >Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3178 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20060131/e53236d0/attachment.bin
