AD sync issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Vsevolod (Simon) Ilyushchenko wrote:
> Rich,
>
> Thanks for your answers!
>
> Richard Megginson wrote on 04/26/2006 02:55 PM:
>> Vsevolod (Simon) Ilyushchenko wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've half gotten the AD sync to work, but I have a couple of issues:
>>>
>>> 1. The updates are not propagated on their own. If I choose 
>>> 'Send/Receive updates' from the sync agreement, they are immediately 
>>> transferred, but it never happens on it's own.
>>
>> Try turning on the replication error log level.
>
> Okay, I see "Replica has no update vector. It has never been 
> initialized." My updates are indeed not sent from FDS to AD, but I 
> don't want this anyway.
>
> The Windows sync docs do not specify which replica role I have to 
> choose first. I actually need a dedicated consumer (AD->FDS only), but 
> if I choose that role, I have to specify a supplier DN, and I'm not 
> sure what I should put there for the Windows sync scenario. So I had 
> to choose 'single master', and that implies sending FDS->AD updates, 
> which currently doesn't work. Looks like these updates won't be sent 
> until I initialize the consumer (AD), and I DON'T want to do this.
>
> So I'm in a bind. :(
I don't think the code is designed to do one way sync.  The way sync 
works with AD is that FDS pulls changes from AD (using the DirSync 
control) and pushes changes to AD (using plain old LDAP operations).  AD 
never contacts FDS (except for password sync, and that's a different 
issue), so you don't need to specify a supplier DN.
>
>>> ../shared/bin/pk12util -d . -P slapd-fa22  -o servercert.pfx -n 
>>> Server-Cert
>>> pk12util-bin: find user certs from nickname failed: security 
>>> library: bad database.
>>
>> Are you missing the trailing "-" after slapd-fa22?
>
> Yes, that was it! Now that I know what to look for, I've noticed this 
> on the wiki in the SSL article (though the WindowsSync pages in the 
> Netscape docs and on the wiki do not mention it :).
>
> Thanks,
> Simon
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3178 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20060426/1b87a164/attachment.bin 


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Apps]     [Maemo Users]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux