Chen Shaopeng wrote: >Rich Megginson wrote: > > >>Scott Boggs wrote: >> >> >> >>>I have just started using the Fedora-DS. I have to say that I am very >>>impressed. I currently am turning my attention towards working with >>>the server on a SE Linux platform. However, I was wondering if it is >>>best to keep with the current static version that is provided via the >>>source download site, or could I get the latest and greatest to see >>>how in integrates. >>> >>> >>We will be releasing a new binary version very soon. >> >> >> > >Could you tell what will be in the new build? and a date? > > We will be making an official announcement within the week, but the new build will have MD5, SHA-256, SHA-384, SHA-512 password support. It will also contain lots of bug fixes, many of which are in the windows sync component. >It would be cool if the build process could be cleanly separated. >For example, it should be easy to build the directory server >alone, and build the admin and console alone. > > The build right now builds the directory server alone, and you can build the console alone as well. See the http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/Building for more information. >That would be easier for other people to participate too. >It's not too scary that way, coz the whole thing is pretty >big. > >rgds > >csp > > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3312 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20051026/b012738d/attachment.bin
