joe wrote: > I followed the steps of Red Hat document to implement Windows 2000 > sync with FDS. After my "initial re-synchronization" process was done, > I checked my directory tree. > > I saw some entries like "cn=Domain Admins, ou=People, dc=example, > dc=com", and it contained "Members/Static Group - uid=Administrator, , > ou=People, dc=example, dc=com" > > in its properties. But I could not find the real entry dn named > "uid=Administrator, , ou=People, dc=example, dc=com" in my ds tree. Is > it the correct result? Or I did This looks wrong. The double comma in the DN should be illegal. I don't believe this is a known problem -- I've never seen this particular issue reported before. Do you otherwise get correct sync results ? i.e. do your regular users and groups get sync'ed ok ? If you enable replication logging, then run a re-sync, there will probably be something in the error log pertaining to this entry. That might tell us what's going wrong. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20051026/d63c8a96/attachment.html
