That worked. I'm back up and running now. Thanks again Richard. - Kevin On 12/5/05, Richard Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com> wrote: > > Kevin Kovach wrote: > > > Thanks again for the reply Richard. > > > > Can you please advise on how I might best go about recovering from > > this so that I can backup all my data and configuration and rebuild > > FDS? Now, I'd probably like to go to FDS 1.0 as well. I'd like to > > get this install up and running just long enough to back everything up > > and then go with a new install of 1.0. > > > > I've tried setting the time on the system back a couple months and > > that did not do the trick. I've noticed now that there's a pumpkin.pl > > PERL script in the fedora-ds directory? Is there some thing temporary > > I can do to expend the wick on the bomb for a bit, so that I might run > > for cover before it goes off again? :-) > > There's nothing you can do except to rebuild ns-slapd. This might work: > 1) cd ldapserver/ldap/servers/slapd > 2) touch main.c > 3) make BUILD_BOMB="" PUMPKIN_AGE=0 .... other make args .... > This will rebuild the ns-slapd binary, which is the one with the > problem. main.c has the bomb code. This will create a new binary > ldapserver/built/release/<platform>/bin/slapd/server/ns-slapd. Just > shutdown your old one and replace it with this new one, the restart. > You should be good to go. > > > > > Thanks. > > > > - Kevin > > > > On 12/5/05, *Richard Megginson* <rmeggins at redhat.com > > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>> wrote: > > > > Kevin Kovach wrote: > > > > > Built this myself from the 7.1 source. You're thinking this is an > > > issue with my build in particular, or you've seen this before? > > > > Yes. The BUILD_BOMB is enabled by default. Our 7.1 binary builds > had > > the build bomb disabled. In order to build with this disabled, use > > something like this: > > make PUMPKIN_AGE=0 BUILD_BOMB="" .... other args .... > > I apologize for this. We will be updating the wiki Building page > > ASAP. > > Future versions of the source code will disable the build bomb by > > default. > > > > > > > > - Kevin > > > > > > On 12/5/05, * Richard Megginson* <rmeggins at redhat.com > > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com> > > > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>>> wrote: > > > > > > Kevin Kovach wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks for the reply Richard. > > > > > > > > Are you able to supply any details on the issue? Is this > > a known > > > > problem that was already being worked on, or is this a > > brand new > > > > issue? If this has been around for a while, do you have a > > > timetable > > > > on a fix? > > > > > > Actually, is your problem in the released FDS 7.1 you > > downloaded from > > > the download site, or did you build it yourself? > > > > > > > > > > > I've checked the list and have not seen anything regarding > > this > > > error > > > > message. If there's anything I can do to help please let > > me know. > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > - Kevin > > > > > > > > On 12/5/05, *Richard Megginson* <rmeggins at redhat.com > > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com> > > > <mailto: rmeggins at redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>> > > > > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com> > > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > No, it's not a cert issue. It's a problem with the core > > > server, and > > > > we're working on a fix right now. > > > > > > > > Kevin Kovach wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello again, > > > > > > > > > > I'm suspecting more and more that it was a certificate > > > issue, since > > > > > the error log references port 636. > > > > > > > > > > However, I've gone over the SSL HOWTO on the FDS > > wiki and > > > I don't > > > > > understand what the problem is. When I installed FDS > > > about 5 months > > > > > ago I used the information provided here, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/dir-server/ag/7.1/ssl.html#1087158 > > < > http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/dir-server/ag/7.1/ssl.html#1087158> > > > > > on setting up a self signed certificate. This link > was > > > posted > > > > on the > > > > > SSL HOWTO on help with using certutil. > > > > > > > > > > I was able to get FDS up and running with SSL after > > a couple > > > > emails to > > > > > the list and a couple changes to the FDS wiki > regarding > > > SSL. As I > > > > > said, it's been running well for the past 5 months > > or so. > > > > > > > > > > My understanding was that the example there created > > a cert > > > that > > > > would > > > > > be valid for 123 months (-v 120) plus the default 3 > > > months? I would > > > > > not expect this cert to have expired already. > > > > > > > > > > That said, I went through the same steps to try and > > > recreate the CA > > > > > and Server certs for the directory again now. After > > doing so > > > > without > > > > > any error messages, I tried to start the directory > > server > > > again and > > > > > I'm getting the same message. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > - Kevin > > > > > > > > > > On 12/5/05, *Kevin Kovach* <kovach at gmail.com > > <mailto:kovach at gmail.com> > > > <mailto:kovach at gmail.com <mailto:kovach at gmail.com>> > > > > <mailto: kovach at gmail.com <mailto:kovach at gmail.com> > > <mailto:kovach at gmail.com <mailto:kovach at gmail.com>>> > > > > > <mailto: kovach at gmail.com <mailto:kovach at gmail.com> > > <mailto:kovach at gmail.com <mailto:kovach at gmail.com>> > > > <mailto:kovach at gmail.com <mailto:kovach at gmail.com> > > <mailto:kovach at gmail.com <mailto:kovach at gmail.com>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > I'm a bit confused this morning. I woke up and > > > realized that my > > > > > directory was down, and when I tried to restart > > it I > > > got the > > > > > following message ... > > > > > > > > > > # ./start-slapd > > > > > [05/Dec/2005:11:52:28 -0500] - ERROR: ** This beta > > > software has > > > > > expired ** > > > > > > > > > > Does this look familiar to anyone? I'm > > continuing to > > > look into > > > > > it, but if it's something simple issue that I'm > > > unaware of I'd > > > > > appreciate any hints as to what the problem is? > > > > > > > > > > Some background information ... > > > > > > > > > > I've been running Fedora Directory Server for > > about 5 > > > months > > > > > without any issues. It's been running great. I > > recently > > > > added a > > > > > root suffix to the directory that went > smoothly. I > > > was able to > > > > > use the new root without any problems after I > added > > > it. I > > > > didn't > > > > > seem to have any issues with that change. This > the > > > only thing > > > > > I've done in the past couple months. > > > > > > > > > > I've just tired to save my config and back up > > the db with > > > > > ./saveconfig, ./db2bak, ./db2ldif, and ./db2dsml > > and all > > > > attempts > > > > > result in the same error message. > > > > > > > > > > Also, the only thing printed to the error log is > > the same > > > > message. > > > > > > > > > > # cat errors > > > > > Fedora-Directory/7.1 B2005.201.2115 > > > > > ldap.hostname.com:636 > > <http://ldap.hostname.com:636> > > > <http://ldap.hostname.com:636> <http://ldap.hostname.com:636> > > > > < http://ldap.hostname.com:636> > > > > > (/opt/fedora-ds/slapd-instname) > > > > > > > > > > [05/Dec/2005:11:46:07 -0500] - ERROR: ** This beta > > > software has > > > > > expired ** > > > > > [05/Dec/2005:11:47:44 -0500] - ERROR: ** This beta > > > software has > > > > > expired ** > > > > > [05/Dec/2005:11:49:03 -0500] - ERROR: ** This beta > > > software has > > > > > expired ** > > > > > [05/Dec/2005:11:52:28 -0500] - ERROR: ** This beta > > > software has > > > > > expired ** > > > > > [05/Dec/2005:11:57:33 -0500] - ERROR: ** This beta > > > software has > > > > > expired ** > > > > > [05/Dec/2005:11:58:30 -0500] - ERROR: ** This beta > > > software has > > > > > expired ** > > > > > [05/Dec/2005:12:00:11 -0500] - ERROR: ** This beta > > > software has > > > > > expired ** > > > > > > > > > > I'm really at a loss as to what has > > expired. Does the > > > > directory > > > > > have some kind of license that has expired? Can > > this be a > > > > message > > > > > for an expired cert? It doesn't really sound > > like it, but > > > > that's > > > > > the only thing I can think of off the top of my > > head. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for any help and/or information. > > > > > > > > > > - Kevin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Take back the web, http://www.switch2firefox.com/ > > > > < http://www.switch2firefox.com/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > >-- > > > > >Fedora-directory-users mailing list > > > > >Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > > <mailto:Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com> > > > <mailto: Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > > <mailto:Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com>> > > > > <mailto:Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > > <mailto:Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com> > > > <mailto: Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > > <mailto:Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com>>> > > > > > > >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > > > > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > > <mailto:Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com> > > > <mailto:Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > > <mailto:Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com>> > > > > <mailto: Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > > <mailto:Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com> > > > <mailto:Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > > <mailto:Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com>>> > > > > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users> > > > > < > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Take back the web, http://www.switch2firefox.com/ > > > < http://www.switch2firefox.com/> > > > > > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > >-- > > > >Fedora-directory-users mailing list > > > >Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > > <mailto:Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com> > > > <mailto:Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > > <mailto:Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com>> > > > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > > > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > > <mailto:Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com> > > > <mailto: Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > > <mailto:Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com>> > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > > < > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Take back the web, http://www.switch2firefox.com/ > > <http://www.switch2firefox.com/> > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > >-- > > >Fedora-directory-users mailing list > > >Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > > <mailto:Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com> > > >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > > <mailto:Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Take back the web, http://www.switch2firefox.com/ > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > >-- > >Fedora-directory-users mailing list > >Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > > > > > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > > > -- Take back the web, http://www.switch2firefox.com/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20051205/8ff24167/attachment.html
