Thanks again for the reply Richard. Can you please advise on how I might best go about recovering from this so that I can backup all my data and configuration and rebuild FDS? Now, I'd probably like to go to FDS 1.0 as well. I'd like to get this install up and running just long enough to back everything up and then go with a new install of 1.0. I've tried setting the time on the system back a couple months and that did not do the trick. I've noticed now that there's a pumpkin.pl PERL script in the fedora-ds directory? Is there some thing temporary I can do to expend the wick on the bomb for a bit, so that I might run for cover before it goes off again? :-) Thanks. - Kevin On 12/5/05, Richard Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com> wrote: > > Kevin Kovach wrote: > > > Built this myself from the 7.1 source. You're thinking this is an > > issue with my build in particular, or you've seen this before? > > Yes. The BUILD_BOMB is enabled by default. Our 7.1 binary builds had > the build bomb disabled. In order to build with this disabled, use > something like this: > make PUMPKIN_AGE=0 BUILD_BOMB="" .... other args .... > I apologize for this. We will be updating the wiki Building page ASAP. > Future versions of the source code will disable the build bomb by default. > > > > > - Kevin > > > > On 12/5/05, * Richard Megginson* <rmeggins at redhat.com > > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>> wrote: > > > > Kevin Kovach wrote: > > > > > Thanks for the reply Richard. > > > > > > Are you able to supply any details on the issue? Is this a known > > > problem that was already being worked on, or is this a brand new > > > issue? If this has been around for a while, do you have a > > timetable > > > on a fix? > > > > Actually, is your problem in the released FDS 7.1 you downloaded > from > > the download site, or did you build it yourself? > > > > > > > > I've checked the list and have not seen anything regarding this > > error > > > message. If there's anything I can do to help please let me know. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > - Kevin > > > > > > On 12/5/05, *Richard Megginson* <rmeggins at redhat.com > > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com> > > > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>>> wrote: > > > > > > No, it's not a cert issue. It's a problem with the core > > server, and > > > we're working on a fix right now. > > > > > > Kevin Kovach wrote: > > > > > > > Hello again, > > > > > > > > I'm suspecting more and more that it was a certificate > > issue, since > > > > the error log references port 636. > > > > > > > > However, I've gone over the SSL HOWTO on the FDS wiki and > > I don't > > > > understand what the problem is. When I installed FDS > > about 5 months > > > > ago I used the information provided here, > > > > > > > > > > http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/dir-server/ag/7.1/ssl.html#1087158 > > > > on setting up a self signed certificate. This link was > > posted > > > on the > > > > SSL HOWTO on help with using certutil. > > > > > > > > I was able to get FDS up and running with SSL after a couple > > > emails to > > > > the list and a couple changes to the FDS wiki regarding > > SSL. As I > > > > said, it's been running well for the past 5 months or so. > > > > > > > > My understanding was that the example there created a cert > > that > > > would > > > > be valid for 123 months (-v 120) plus the default 3 > > months? I would > > > > not expect this cert to have expired already. > > > > > > > > That said, I went through the same steps to try and > > recreate the CA > > > > and Server certs for the directory again now. After doing > so > > > without > > > > any error messages, I tried to start the directory server > > again and > > > > I'm getting the same message. > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > - Kevin > > > > > > > > On 12/5/05, *Kevin Kovach* <kovach at gmail.com > > <mailto:kovach at gmail.com> > > > <mailto:kovach at gmail.com <mailto:kovach at gmail.com>> > > > > <mailto: kovach at gmail.com <mailto:kovach at gmail.com> > > <mailto:kovach at gmail.com <mailto:kovach at gmail.com>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > I'm a bit confused this morning. I woke up and > > realized that my > > > > directory was down, and when I tried to restart it I > > got the > > > > following message ... > > > > > > > > # ./start-slapd > > > > [05/Dec/2005:11:52:28 -0500] - ERROR: ** This beta > > software has > > > > expired ** > > > > > > > > Does this look familiar to anyone? I'm continuing to > > look into > > > > it, but if it's something simple issue that I'm > > unaware of I'd > > > > appreciate any hints as to what the problem is? > > > > > > > > Some background information ... > > > > > > > > I've been running Fedora Directory Server for about 5 > > months > > > > without any issues. It's been running great. I > recently > > > added a > > > > root suffix to the directory that went smoothly. I > > was able to > > > > use the new root without any problems after I added > > it. I > > > didn't > > > > seem to have any issues with that change. This the > > only thing > > > > I've done in the past couple months. > > > > > > > > I've just tired to save my config and back up the db > with > > > > ./saveconfig, ./db2bak, ./db2ldif, and ./db2dsml and all > > > attempts > > > > result in the same error message. > > > > > > > > Also, the only thing printed to the error log is the > same > > > message. > > > > > > > > # cat errors > > > > Fedora-Directory/7.1 B2005.201.2115 > > > > ldap.hostname.com:636 > > <http://ldap.hostname.com:636> <http://ldap.hostname.com:636> > > > <http://ldap.hostname.com:636> > > > > (/opt/fedora-ds/slapd-instname) > > > > > > > > [05/Dec/2005:11:46:07 -0500] - ERROR: ** This beta > > software has > > > > expired ** > > > > [05/Dec/2005:11:47:44 -0500] - ERROR: ** This beta > > software has > > > > expired ** > > > > [05/Dec/2005:11:49:03 -0500] - ERROR: ** This beta > > software has > > > > expired ** > > > > [05/Dec/2005:11:52:28 -0500] - ERROR: ** This beta > > software has > > > > expired ** > > > > [05/Dec/2005:11:57:33 -0500] - ERROR: ** This beta > > software has > > > > expired ** > > > > [05/Dec/2005:11:58:30 -0500] - ERROR: ** This beta > > software has > > > > expired ** > > > > [05/Dec/2005:12:00:11 -0500] - ERROR: ** This beta > > software has > > > > expired ** > > > > > > > > I'm really at a loss as to what has expired. Does the > > > directory > > > > have some kind of license that has expired? Can this be > a > > > message > > > > for an expired cert? It doesn't really sound like it, > but > > > that's > > > > the only thing I can think of off the top of my head. > > > > > > > > Thanks for any help and/or information. > > > > > > > > - Kevin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Take back the web, http://www.switch2firefox.com/ > > > < http://www.switch2firefox.com/> > > > > > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > >-- > > > >Fedora-directory-users mailing list > > > >Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > > <mailto:Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com> > > > <mailto:Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > > <mailto:Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com>> > > > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > > > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > > <mailto:Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com> > > > <mailto: Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > > <mailto:Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com>> > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > > < > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Take back the web, http://www.switch2firefox.com/ > > <http://www.switch2firefox.com/> > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > >-- > > >Fedora-directory-users mailing list > > >Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > > <mailto:Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com> > > >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > > <mailto:Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Take back the web, http://www.switch2firefox.com/ > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > >-- > >Fedora-directory-users mailing list > >Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > > > > > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > > > -- Take back the web, http://www.switch2firefox.com/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20051205/7d1175d0/attachment.html
