Sam Tran wrote: >On 6/29/05, David Boreham <david_list at boreham.org> wrote: > > >>Sam Tran wrote: >> >> >> >>>I would like to know what implementation of Kerberos is prefered to >>>setup SASL/GESSAPI with Fedora DS: MIT or Heimdal? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>It was developed tested and is supported with MIT (or the OS vendor's >>native krb implementation in the case of other OS'es, which I believe >>are all derived from MIT). >>Doesn't mean that it won't work ok with Heimdal of course. >> >> >> > >Has anyone implemented FDS with Heimdal. > >Heimdal allows you to store the user passwords in LDAP. Is there a >password change mechanism for that situation? > > There is a "ldap backend" for Heimdal, but it uses the non-standard ldapi interface (e.g. LDAP through a unix domain file based socket rather than a TCP/IP socket). You would have to port that code to use an ldap or ldaps interface for use with FDS. Otherwise, I'm not sure if GSSAPI supports a password change mechanism. If so, you could do this through FDS. >Thanks. >Sam > >-- >Fedora-directory-users mailing list >Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20050630/c3c1c443/attachment.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3312 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20050630/c3c1c443/attachment.bin
