On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 12:50:06AM +0530, Sudip Midya wrote: > Signed-off-by: Sudip Midya <midya.sudip@xxxxxxxxx> > --- Patch format still needs work. The subject line should be short, the patch description should be in the body of the message, not the subject. Also, this is not a patch for the "mm" subsystem. Addressing the reason given for the change: the RCU lock is not actually protecting queue_delayed_work(), so while the code change may be OK, the reason given for removing it is not. So why is it safe to remove the rcu_read_lock()? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
