On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 10:58:16PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote: > It's already part of xfs/244, I noticed this bug because xfs/244 kept > running. I just put the minimum steps in commit log. So I think we're > good :) But only as part of xfs/244 which doesn't work for v5 file systems. To have good coverage we should not rely on testing an old format. That beeing said I can't see a good reason for why xfs/244 should not be run for v5 file systems, so I'll look into that instead. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
