On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 09:11:00AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Can you rebase (and repost the series) on top of the preparations > in for-next that Dave just pushed out? > > That should make reviewing a whole lot easier. I'm on vacation all week (in the desert with tcp-over-cactus) but I don't want the reflink review to stall, so here's a branch atop the for-next branch that Dave announced last night: https://github.com/djwong/linux/tree/for-dave-for-4.9-3 The scary parts are the rework that I had to do to integrate with hch's delalloc rewrite. I think all the changes to xfs_file_iomap_begin_delay are right (the regression tests all pass, at least) but it could use another set of eyes. No changes to the userland tools, they're still at: https://github.com/djwong/xfsprogs/tree/for-dave-for-4.9-2 --D _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
