On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 11:54:36PM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote: > The man 8 xfs_repair said "xfs_repair run without the -n option will > always return a status code of 0". That's not correct. > > xfs_repair will return 2 if it finds a fs log which needs to be > replayed or cleared, 1 if runtime error is encountered, and 0 for > all other cases. > > Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > Hi, > > V2 patch did below things: > - change the description for xfs_repair > - remove the description for "xfs_repair -L" > > Thanks, > Zorro > > man/man8/xfs_repair.8 | 7 ++++++- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/man/man8/xfs_repair.8 b/man/man8/xfs_repair.8 > index 1b4d9e3..e45fd90 100644 > --- a/man/man8/xfs_repair.8 > +++ b/man/man8/xfs_repair.8 > @@ -504,12 +504,17 @@ that is known to be free. The entry is therefore invalid and is deleted. > This message refers to a large directory. > If the directory were small, the message would read "junking entry ...". > .SH EXIT STATUS > +.TP > .B xfs_repair \-n > (no modify node) > will return a status of 1 if filesystem corruption was detected and > 0 if no filesystem corruption was detected. > +.TP > .B xfs_repair > -run without the \-n option will always return a status code of 0. > +run without the \-n option will return a status code of 2 if it finds a > +filesystem log which needs to be replayed(by a mount/umount cycle) or > +cleared(by -L option), 1 if a runtime error is encountered, and 0 in all > +other cases, whether or not filesystem corruption was detected. So... I'd rather the documentation about the return code reflect the status of the filesystem -- 2 means "unclean log, replay it or zap it", 1 means "errors encountered, fs may not be correct", and 0 /should/ mean "fs is correct". OTOH I don't know for sure that xfs_repair always cleans up the fs on the first try. From my fuzzing experiments a few years ago this seems to be the case nearly all the time (unlike e2fsck) but not 100%. ISTR asking Dave about this, and I think he said that the FS should be clean if repair returns 0. But I'll let him reiterate that if it's true; don't trust my crummy memory, that's why I have filesystems. ;) --D > .SH BUGS > The filesystem to be checked and repaired must have been > unmounted cleanly using normal system administration procedures > -- > 2.7.4 > > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
