On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 05:53:59PM -0400, CAI Qian wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > Fundamentally a splice infrastructure problem. If we let splice race > > with hole punch and other fallocate() based extent manipulations to > > avoid this lockdep warning, we allow potential for read or write to > > regions of the file that have been freed. We can live with having > > lockdep complain about this potential deadlock as it is unlikely to > > ever occur in practice. The other option is simply not an acceptible > > solution.... > The problem with living with having this lockdep complain that > it seems once this lockdep happens, it will prevent other complains from > showing up. For example, I have to apply the commit dc3a04d to fix an early > rcu lockdep first during the bisecting. Not my problem. My primary responsibility is to maintain the filesystem integrity and data safety for the hundreds of thousands (millions?) of XFS users: it's their data, and I will always err on the side of safety and integrity. As such I really don't care if there's collateral damage to developer debug tools - user data integrity requirements always come first... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
