> + __uint64_t cui_id;
> + struct xfs_ail_cursor cur;
> + struct xfs_ail *ailp = log->l_ailp;
> +
> + cud_formatp = item->ri_buf[0].i_addr;
> + ASSERT(item->ri_buf[0].i_len == sizeof(struct xfs_cud_log_format));
Should we return -EFSCORRUPTED here instead?
> + /* XXX: do nothing for now */
What else would be do in the future here?
> +static void
> +xfs_trans_set_refcount_flags(
> + struct xfs_phys_extent *refc,
> + enum xfs_refcount_intent_type type)
> +{
> + refc->pe_flags = 0;
> + switch (type) {
> + case XFS_REFCOUNT_INCREASE:
> + refc->pe_flags |= XFS_REFCOUNT_EXTENT_INCREASE;
> + break;
> + case XFS_REFCOUNT_DECREASE:
> + refc->pe_flags |= XFS_REFCOUNT_EXTENT_DECREASE;
> + break;
> + case XFS_REFCOUNT_ALLOC_COW:
> + refc->pe_flags |= XFS_REFCOUNT_EXTENT_ALLOC_COW;
> + break;
> + case XFS_REFCOUNT_FREE_COW:
> + refc->pe_flags |= XFS_REFCOUNT_EXTENT_FREE_COW;
> + break;
Is there any good reasons to use a type enum in core, but flags on
disk?
> +int
> +xfs_trans_log_finish_refcount_update(
> + struct xfs_trans *tp,
> + struct xfs_cud_log_item *cudp,
> + enum xfs_refcount_intent_type type,
> + xfs_fsblock_t startblock,
> + xfs_extlen_t blockcount,
> + struct xfs_btree_cur **pcur)
> +{
> + int error;
> +
> + /* XXX: leave this empty for now */
> + error = -EFSCORRUPTED;
Lift might be a lot easier if this patch and "xfs: connect refcount
adjust functions to upper layers" were merged into one. It's not like
they are testable independently anyway.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
