Re: [PATCH 3/4] xfs: make xfs_inode_set_eofblocks_tag cheaper for the common case

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 12:02:09PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> > I don't think taking it should be too bad, but given the ops ordering
> > it also seems entirely pointless to even take it.
> > 
> 
> Then why are we taking it? I assumed it at least served as a memory
> barrier...

I meant to take it for that early check, not in general.

I guess this is another hint we should try to look into using proper
atomic bitops here..

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs



[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux