[PATCH] xfs_db: pass the inode cluster offset when copying inodes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In copy_inode_chunk, we try to determine whether or not an inode is
free as part of copying the inode records.  The macros involved in
testing ir_free require both the inode record and the offset of an
inode within that chunk.  Prior to sparse inode support, the loop
index "i" was also the inode chunk offset; however, when sparse
support was added, "i" became the inode offset within a cluster and
"ioff" became the inode cluster offset within an inode chunk.
Therefore, it is necessary to pass "ioff + i" to do the free-ness
calculation correctly.

This was discovered while trying to take metadumps of fs images for
scrub testing.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 db/metadump.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/db/metadump.c b/db/metadump.c
index e82b660..c769958 100644
--- a/db/metadump.c
+++ b/db/metadump.c
@@ -2292,7 +2292,7 @@ copy_inode_chunk(
 
 			/* process_inode handles free inodes, too */
 			if (!process_inode(agno, agino + ioff + i, dip,
-			    XFS_INOBT_IS_FREE_DISK(rp, i)))
+			    XFS_INOBT_IS_FREE_DISK(rp, ioff + i)))
 				goto pop_out;
 
 			inodes_copied++;

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs



[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux