On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 04:31:56PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is the eighth revision of a patchset that adds to XFS kernel
> support for mapping multiple file logical blocks to the same physical
> block (reflink/deduplication), implements the beginnings of online
> metadata scrubbing and preening, and implements reverse mapping for
> the realtime device. There shouldn't be any incompatible on-disk
> format changes, pending a thorough review of the patches within.
>
> (NOTE: In the git trees, this series is preceded by the pending rmap
> fixes patches posted to linux-xfs a few days ago.)
>
Those patches are included in the latest for-next, but this series still
doesn't apply for me. I see the git tree includes a4b60f5 ("xfs: port
differences from xfsprogs libxfs") which gets me a bit further if I pull
that over, but it still doesn't apply in full. I get up to 14/71... am I
missing other bits?
Brian
> The reflink implementation features a simple per-AG b+tree containing
> tuples of (physical block, blockcount, refcount) with the key being
> the physical block. Copy on Write (CoW) is implemented by creating a
> separate CoW extent mapping fork and using the existing delayed
> allocation mechanism to try to allocate as large of a replacement
> extent as possible before committing the new data to media. A CoW
> extent size hint allows administrators to influence the size of the
> replacement extents, and certain writes can be "promoted" to CoW when
> it would be advantageous to reduce fragmentation. The userspace
> interface to reflink and dedupe are the VFS FICLONE, FICLONERANGE, and
> FIDEDUPERANGE ioctls, which were previously private to btrfs.
>
> At the beginning of the patchset is the establishment of a per-AG
> block reservation mechanism. This "hides" some blocks from the
> regular block allocator so that the refcountbt and rmapbt can expand
> without hitting ENOSPC. The block reservation mechanism built into
> transactions isn't sufficient for this purpose because it only
> reserves blocks at a broad filesystem level, whereas per-AG btree
> expansion requires specific per-AG reservations.
>
> Next comes the reference count B+tree, which tracks the reference
> counts of shared extents (refcount > 1) and extents being used to
> stage a copy-on-write operation (refcount == 1). We define new log
> redo item pairs both for refcount updates and for inode fork updates;
> these plug into the deferred ops framework created for the reverse
> mapping patches.
>
> After that comes the reflink code, which handles the actual
> copy-on-write behavior that is required for block sharing; and
> connections to the VFS file ops for reflink, dedupe, and
> copy_file_range.
>
> At the very end of the patchset is a reimplementation of the swap
> extents code that uses reverse mapping and block mapping deferred ops
> to implement xfs_swap_extent for filesystems with reverse-mapping.
>
> If you're going to start using this mess, you probably ought to just
> pull from my github trees for kernel[1], xfsprogs[2], xfstests[3],
> xfs-docs[4], and man-pages[5]. The kernel patches in the git trees
> should apply to 4.8-rc3; xfsprogs patches to for-next; and xfstest to
> master.
>
> The patches have been xfstested with x64, ppc64, and armhf; all tests
> in the clone and rmap groups pass. AFAICT they don't cause any new
> failures for the 'auto' group.
>
> This is an extraordinary way to eat your data. Enjoy!
> Comments and questions are, as always, welcome.
>
> --D
>
> [1] https://github.com/djwong/linux/tree/djwong-devel
> [2] https://github.com/djwong/xfsprogs/tree/djwong-devel
> [3] https://github.com/djwong/xfstests/tree/djwong-devel
> [4] https://github.com/djwong/xfs-documentation/tree/djwong-devel
> [5] https://github.com/djwong/man-pages/tree/djwong-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
