On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 02:14:52AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 07:24:56PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > Fix various code sloppinesses pointed out by Coverity.
> >
> > Coverity-id: 1371628 - 1371638
>
> > @@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ fsmap(
> > high.rm_owner = ULLONG_MAX;
> > high.rm_offset = ULLONG_MAX;
> > high.rm_flags = XFS_RMAP_ATTR_FORK | XFS_RMAP_BMBT_BLOCK | XFS_RMAP_UNWRITTEN;
> > + high.rm_blockcount = low.rm_blockcount = 0;
>
> Do the low initialization near the remaining low fields?
>
> or better do a struct initialization ala
>
> struct xfs_rmap_irec low = { 0, };
> struct xfs_rmap_irec high = { 0, };
>
> that ensures the who;le structure is zero-filled for uninitialized
> fields.
Ok.
> > diff --git a/repair/phase5.c b/repair/phase5.c
> > index e583879..5a7185c 100644
> > --- a/repair/phase5.c
> > +++ b/repair/phase5.c
> > @@ -1464,7 +1464,7 @@ prop_rmap_cursor(
> > * and set the rightsib pointer of current block
> > */
> > #ifdef XR_BLD_INO_TRACE
> > - fprintf(stderr, " ino prop agbno %d ", lptr->prev_agbno);
> > + fprintf(stderr, " rmap prop agbno %d ", lptr->prev_agbno);
> > #endif
>
> Did Coveryity really point this out? :)
Heh, nope. I'll add it in the changelog.
> > @@ -1548,6 +1548,7 @@ prop_rmap_highkey(
> > bt_key->rm_offset = cpu_to_be64(
> > libxfs_rmap_irec_offset_pack(&high_key));
> >
> > + key.rm_blockcount = 0;
>
> should probably be a struct initializer again
<nod>
--D
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
