On 8/21/16 10:34 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 8/21/16 9:06 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 09:16:38AM -0500, Bill O'Donnell wrote:
...
>> static int
>> init_check_command(
>> const cmdinfo_t *ct)
>> {
>> if (!fspath)
>> return 1;
>>
>> /* Always run commands that we are told to skip here */
>> if (ct->flags & CMD_SKIP_CHECK)
>> return 1;
>>
>> /* if it's an XFS filesystem, always run the command */
>> if (!(fs_path->fs_flags & FS_FOREIGN))
>> return 1;
>
> Sorry for the late review; thanks for getting on it, Dave - but,
> isn't "foreign ok" exactly == "skip check?"
>
> The only check that gets skipped is the foreign check, so just
> setting FOREIGN_OK seems to accomplish the same thing without
> more flag complexity, no?
Oh, the subliminal brain reminded me that we want to be able to
issue help or quit whether or not we had the "-f" flag, regardless
of the filesystem, and that "foreign" isn't ok unless the -f flag
is set, so we do need a class of "always works" commands.
I guess that was the point of the patch, but I suppose some clarity
in comments or commitlog would help slow people like me. ;)
Thanks,
-Eric
> Thanks,
> -Eric
>
>
>> /* If the user specified foreign filesysetms are ok, run it */
>> if (foreign_allowed &&
>> (ct->flags & CMD_FLAG_FOREIGN_OK))
>> return 1;
>>
>> /* foreign filesystem and it's no a valid command! */
>> fprintf(stderr, _("%s command is for XFS filesystems only\n"),
>> ct->name);
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Dave.
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
