On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 07:37:07PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:54:44PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Sure, find below. Not been near a compiler. > > It has now. Below are the additions I need, and things seem to be > passing fine with that. > > Note that to fit the existing XFS lock asserts I'm using > _lockdep_is_held directly instead of lockdep_assert_held_exclusive. > All the exports are there, but I'm just trying to make sure you're > not going to shout at me for that later :) Hurm, if you're going to directly use that maybe we should pick a better name ;-) Also, be sure to check the debug_locks variable, if that's cleared the result of _lockdep_is_held() isn't reliable -- we stop tracking lock state when there's an error. Thanks! _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
