On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 20:49 +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 10:01:14AM +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 09:50 +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > > > > I'd much prefer that fiemap gives exact information about shared > > > extents. FIEMAP is a diagnostic tool and as such we need it to > > > accurately reflect the exact extent map of the inode being > > > queried > > > so we aren't mislead about the layout of the file during trouble > > > shooting. > > > > Hi Dave, you are right, and here is a side note: we were using > > FIEMAP > > for optimizing image deployment in production, so it is a > > diagnostic > > tool and more. > > Yay, data corruption ahoy! > > Hasn't /anyone/ listened to the repeated statements from fs > developers that FIEMAP is not a safe method of optimising data > copying? Yes, which is kind of sad from the user's perspective. We had issues with XFS, not ext4, and tweaking preallocation helped. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
