On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 08:39:50AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > Rather than have to make major changes to core infrastructure now, > let's work this out as a separate patchset to clean up the rmap and > reflink code in the next couple of releases. It's going to be better > to get working code out there now under the experimental tag than it > is is to keep it as an out of tree patchset for another cycle. The problm is that this does not only affect the rmap code (for which I suspect it actually is fine), but also regresses the freed extent logging. If you want minimal changes we should simply drop the patches to move over the freed extent tracking to the new deferred ops mechanism for now. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
