On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 06:22:46PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> So such blocks can be correctly identified and have their operations
> structutes attached to validate recovery has not resulted in a
structures not?
> correct block.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
> fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
> index f7f9635..dbfbc26 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
> @@ -2233,6 +2233,7 @@ xlog_recover_get_buf_lsn(
> case XFS_ABTC_CRC_MAGIC:
> case XFS_ABTB_MAGIC:
> case XFS_ABTC_MAGIC:
> + case XFS_RMAP_CRC_MAGIC:
> case XFS_IBT_CRC_MAGIC:
> case XFS_IBT_MAGIC: {
> struct xfs_btree_block *btb = blk;
> @@ -2401,6 +2402,9 @@ xlog_recover_validate_buf_type(
> case XFS_BMAP_MAGIC:
> bp->b_ops = &xfs_bmbt_buf_ops;
> break;
> + case XFS_RMAP_CRC_MAGIC:
> + bp->b_ops = &xfs_rmapbt_buf_ops;
> + break;
> default:
> xfs_warn(mp, "Bad btree block magic!");
> ASSERT(0);
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
