On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 09:54:08AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:47:50AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 02:28:25PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 06:22:08PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > > > Create two helper functions to assist with mapping, unmapping, and > > > > converting flag status of extents in a file's data/attr forks. For > > > > non-shared files we can use the _alloc, _free, and _convert functions; > > > > when reflink comes these functions will be augmented to deal with > > > > shared extents. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rmap.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rmap.c > > > > index f92eaa1..76fc5c2 100644 > > > > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rmap.c > > > > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rmap.c > > > > @@ -1123,11 +1123,53 @@ done: > > > > return error; > > > > } > > > > > > > > +/* > > > > + * Convert an unwritten extent to a real extent or vice versa. > > > > + */ > > > > +STATIC int > > > > +xfs_rmap_convert( > > > > + struct xfs_btree_cur *cur, > > > > + xfs_agblock_t bno, > > > > + xfs_extlen_t len, > > > > + bool unwritten, > > > > + struct xfs_owner_info *oinfo) > > > > +{ > > > > + return __xfs_rmap_convert(cur, bno, len, unwritten, oinfo); > > > > +} > > > > + > > > > > > Hmm, these all look like 1-1 mappings and they're static as well. Is the > > > additional interface for reflink? If so, I think it might be better to > > > punt this down to where it is really used (reflink). > > > > Originally they were, but since the only caller of these functions is > > _rmap_finish_one, this whole patch can drop out. > > > > Later on in reflink, map/unmap/convert for reflinked files get totally > > separate "shared" variants, along with corresponding RUI type codes. > > > > Speaking of which, the shared and non-shared alloc/free/convert > > functions are at a high level the same. Each function has 8-10 places > > where they differ (mostly in which btree functions they call) and I > > wondered -- should I refactor them into a single megafunction that > > takes a bunch of function pointers? > > Use an ops structure containing function pointers. But that can be > doen once the code is merged - it doesn't need to be done right > away. > > > It's a little unwieldly to have > > so much to pass in, but on the other hand we wouldn't have to maintain > > two versions of basically the same code. > > An ops structure fixes that problem. I actually did mean an ops structure; passing in function pointers as args is wayyyy fugly... but I'd considered that making a bunch of small functions + a struct might not be much better. :) --D > > > Cheers, > > Dave. > -- > Dave Chinner > david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs