On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:11:37PM +0800, Kaho Ng wrote:
> The indentation in this function is different from the other functions.
> Those spacebars are converted to tabs to improve readability.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kaho Ng <ngkaho1234@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
> index 1f88e1c..4f84dde 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
> @@ -543,12 +543,12 @@ xfs_btree_ptr_addr(
> */
> STATIC struct xfs_btree_block *
> xfs_btree_get_iroot(
> - struct xfs_btree_cur *cur)
> + struct xfs_btree_cur *cur)
> {
> - struct xfs_ifork *ifp;
> + struct xfs_ifork *ifp;
>
> - ifp = XFS_IFORK_PTR(cur->bc_private.b.ip, cur-
> >bc_private.b.whichfork);
> - return (struct xfs_btree_block *)ifp->if_broot;
> + ifp = XFS_IFORK_PTR(cur->bc_private.b.ip, cur-
> >bc_private.b.whichfork);
> + return (struct xfs_btree_block *)ifp->if_broot;
> }
That's better, but your mailer is still doing weird things to the
patch. It line wrapped it this time, and converted all the spaces to
some wierd multi-byte character instead of a plain ascii space.
What you should do is send the patch to yourself, extract it from
the email you receive, and try to apply it to a clean tree. If you
can do that, then the patch is not getting mangled when you send it.
See Documentation/SubmittingPatches and
Documentation/email-clients.txt for help.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
